国庆前刚拿它录了点东西……感动~~~~~转贴~~~~~~~~~~
Mix的field test，也基本代表偶的意见~~~~~~~
CONVERTER COMPARISONS
The HD192's A/Ds sound dramatically superior to any other outboard ADCs (including the Apogee AD16) that I've heard in this price range. Upping the ante, my much pricier Apogee Rosetta 96's A/Ds sounded a bit warmer (less edgy) and smoother (exhibiting a flatter frequency response) than the HD192's A/Ds when each converter set was slaved in turn to its own internal clock.
The HD192's D/A conveters presented a flat spectral balance, devoid of the typical peaks and blurriness in the upper bass and low mids that inexpensive converters routinely manifest. Compared to a Benchmark DAC-1, the HD192's D/As exhibited less depth and nuance, and the DAC-1 sounded warmer and fuller. But keep in mind that Benchmark's DAC-1 is six times more expensive than the MOTU unit on a per-channel basis and lacks most of the HD192's potent functionality. Despite this tough comparison, the HD192's D/As add a lot of value to what is already an extremely cost-effective and impressive package.
Considering the HD192's rock-bottom price, any sins of omission are easily forgiven. That said, I wish the unit featured both a headphone output and calibration trims. The HD192's A/Ds are calibrated such that +4 dBu equals -14 dBFS, an excellent level for most tracking applications. However, I ran into headroom problems with the HD192 when tracking drums using preamps and high-sensitivity mics that don't offer pads.
[ 本帖最后由 佐佐木史朗 于 07-10-14 14:27 编辑 ]
CONVERTER COMPARISONS
The HD192's A/Ds sound dramatically superior to any other outboard ADCs (including the Apogee AD16) that I've heard in this price range. Upping the ante, my much pricier Apogee Rosetta 96's A/Ds sounded a bit warmer (less edgy) and smoother (exhibiting a flatter frequency response) than the HD192's A/Ds when each converter set was slaved in turn to its own internal clock.
The HD192's D/A conveters presented a flat spectral balance, devoid of the typical peaks and blurriness in the upper bass and low mids that inexpensive converters routinely manifest. Compared to a Benchmark DAC-1, the HD192's D/As exhibited less depth and nuance, and the DAC-1 sounded warmer and fuller. But keep in mind that Benchmark's DAC-1 is six times more expensive than the MOTU unit on a per-channel basis and lacks most of the HD192's potent functionality. Despite this tough comparison, the HD192's D/As add a lot of value to what is already an extremely cost-effective and impressive package.
Considering the HD192's rock-bottom price, any sins of omission are easily forgiven. That said, I wish the unit featured both a headphone output and calibration trims. The HD192's A/Ds are calibrated such that +4 dBu equals -14 dBFS, an excellent level for most tracking applications. However, I ran into headroom problems with the HD192 when tracking drums using preamps and high-sensitivity mics that don't offer pads.
[ 本帖最后由 佐佐木史朗 于 07-10-14 14:27 编辑 ]