to dll:buffer是不会有问题的了,1024的buffer和256的buffer对于RME的卡来说不会有非常大的区别,图中为1024个buffer,rme 9632,3.05驱动
to margindge:全部音频文件为44.1k 24bit,saw里面也是同样的设置
to exlunxp:晕一个....认命了
to all:大家不要讨论偶的MT load为什么90%了,关键是MT load和Task Manager的CPU占用率的关系:90/46~2/1,就是说根本就是单核进程,CPU占用率永远不可能高于50%,据VR详解,3.9J以后木有这样的问题..
[ 本帖最后由 bigmusic 于 07-7-1 21:39 编辑 ]
to margindge:全部音频文件为44.1k 24bit,saw里面也是同样的设置
to exlunxp:晕一个....认命了
to all:大家不要讨论偶的MT load为什么90%了,关键是MT load和Task Manager的CPU占用率的关系:90/46~2/1,就是说根本就是单核进程,CPU占用率永远不可能高于50%,据VR详解,3.9J以后木有这样的问题..
[ 本帖最后由 bigmusic 于 07-7-1 21:39 编辑 ]
As I have always stated... dual cpu systems are harder to stabilize... every component must be dual stable... that means every app and driver and background service... many of which no one programmer has control of...
I can stabilize SAWStudio to the best of my ability... but it uses dozens of drivers from third parties... and DX and VST are all dependent on the registry and hunderds of dlls each written by hindreds of other programmers... to get evrything stable is very complex... dual cpus add serious complexity to the loop.
Bob L
I can stabilize SAWStudio to the best of my ability... but it uses dozens of drivers from third parties... and DX and VST are all dependent on the registry and hunderds of dlls each written by hindreds of other programmers... to get evrything stable is very complex... dual cpus add serious complexity to the loop.
Bob L
還找到這篇, 是 duo core出來之前的, duo core 明顯改善了windows的效能
Dual cpu and hyperthreaded machines have generally been known to be troublesome at best... the advantages are slight, in my opinion... and yes... SAWStudio is designed fully multi-threaded and multi-cpu aware... but as mentioned in many other threads... there is a lot to keeping everything stable... each plugin will spawn many of its own threads... DX spawns many threads... each driver is in different threads... they ALL have to be designed with no loopholes in the code to remain stable on multiple cpus (or anything that looks like multiple cpus)... its pretty tough, in my experience, to make it all happen... even many of the core elements of Windows still have trouble... like firewire... like DirectShow... like many things.
I still recommend single cpu well tweaked machines for my turnkeys... any slight performance improvement at the cost of stability is not necessarily a bonus, in my opinion.
Bob L
Dual cpu and hyperthreaded machines have generally been known to be troublesome at best... the advantages are slight, in my opinion... and yes... SAWStudio is designed fully multi-threaded and multi-cpu aware... but as mentioned in many other threads... there is a lot to keeping everything stable... each plugin will spawn many of its own threads... DX spawns many threads... each driver is in different threads... they ALL have to be designed with no loopholes in the code to remain stable on multiple cpus (or anything that looks like multiple cpus)... its pretty tough, in my experience, to make it all happen... even many of the core elements of Windows still have trouble... like firewire... like DirectShow... like many things.
I still recommend single cpu well tweaked machines for my turnkeys... any slight performance improvement at the cost of stability is not necessarily a bonus, in my opinion.
Bob L