录音/制作/创作 吉他 扩声技术 视频技术 作品展示 生活 信息 更多... | 音频应用专卖店

[新闻] UAD 4.9

( 22 )
12
 
[收藏]
-  第 2 页  -

1368
#16 07-12-14 16:21
刚刚分别试用了Waves的TransX和UAD的Transient Designer,UAD的确实比Waves的好太多了,UAD处理后的效果干净、明显,的确有其过人之处,值得购买!

13669
#17 07-12-14 16:45

回复 #16 tuyun 的帖子

是的, 乾淨、聲音自然......也容易調出好效果。

[ 本帖最后由 himhui 于 07-12-14 17:03 编辑 ]

13669
#18 07-12-14 17:49
一位老外對比了硬件....

他認為 attack 按鈕所調出來的效果在數字世界比起使用硬件要好, 尤其在極端設置的情況下。而在 sustain方面, 一般的插件都模擬不好, 雖然 UA 這次已是不錯, 但比起硬件亦只能達 60%-70%~~~ (其實已不俗了... )

I A/B tested it right away with the hardware...

IMO I think that the "ATTACK" knob sounds better in the digital realm. That is, the plugin sounds better than the hardware in that regard, especially at extreme settings.

No manufacturer has successfully modelled the "SUSTAIN" feature of the SPL, and I can say that UA although they did a great job, didn't get it either. The hardware features an earthshaking low-end when using the sustain knob at extreme settings on kickdrums. It has got a certain heaviness to it which I'm afraid to say the plugin just doesn't have. You get a closer result to what the SUSTAIN does on the hardware if you also use the attack knob to decrease transients abit. Then the two start sounding more alike.. but the plugin still lacks the beef.

A SUSTAIN hardware setting of +12 equals about +20 on the plugin and a -3 on the attack.

So again.. the ATTACK sounds better I think, but the SUSTAIN is about 60-70% there.

[ 本帖最后由 himhui 于 07-12-14 17:55 编辑 ]

2216
#19 07-12-20 22:48
看来还得搞个 硬件的更爽

6640
#20 07-12-23 13:13
我前一阵刚买了它的全套,结果它又出新的

64
#21 07-12-23 16:58

非常好用,力道立刻出现,乐队提升也很棒!有效!

1368
#22 07-12-23 22:03
突然发现Transient Monster居然和UAD的有几分神似,至少好过Sony和Waves的,大家可以看看:http://www.stillwellaudio.com/?page_id=18

2216
#23 07-12-26 12:19
Transient Monster不是很好
实际用起来要比Sony和Waves要差一些的
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

搜索