转一篇文章,关于压缩与EQ的关系
(大早上要出门,谁有空可以翻译下呵呵..)Why you should EQ, then compress, then EQ again
This applies particularly to mastering, but it can apply anytime you are using EQ and compression together.
![]()
It's an obvious question. Should you EQ then compress, or compress then EQ? The answer depends on exactly why you are EQing.
If you are EQing a track because it has some sort of defect - perhaps too dull, too bass-heavy, mids lacking in sparkle - whatever the reason, you should EQ before you compress.
If you compress a track that has an EQ problem, then the compressor will be making its gain change decisions on faulty information. That is hardly going to result in good compression, which should be obvious once you think about it.
On the other hand, if a track already sounds well-balanced EQ-wise, then there is no need to EQ before compression. The action of a compressor however often results in a subjective dulling of the sound, so there is every likelihood that you will want to EQ after compressing.
The ultimate solution is to separate conceptually the corrective and creative applications of EQ. Once this is in your mind, it will be obvious that EQ problems have to be fixed before compression, and then after compression you will want to take the opportunity to perfect the frequency balance of whatever it is you are working on.
It's a good job that extra EQ plug-in instances don't cost anything (other than processor power of course!).
If you are EQing a track because it has some sort of defect - perhaps too dull, too bass-heavy, mids lacking in sparkle - whatever the reason, you should EQ before you compress.
If you compress a track that has an EQ problem, then the compressor will be making its gain change decisions on faulty information. That is hardly going to result in good compression, which should be obvious once you think about it.
On the other hand, if a track already sounds well-balanced EQ-wise, then there is no need to EQ before compression. The action of a compressor however often results in a subjective dulling of the sound, so there is every likelihood that you will want to EQ after compressing.
The ultimate solution is to separate conceptually the corrective and creative applications of EQ. Once this is in your mind, it will be obvious that EQ problems have to be fixed before compression, and then after compression you will want to take the opportunity to perfect the frequency balance of whatever it is you are working on.
It's a good job that extra EQ plug-in instances don't cost anything (other than processor power of course!).
吐了，我翻译的好烂。。。。。将就看吧
为什么你要先eq，再compress，然后再次eq？？？
这种做法在母带处理中被经常用到，但是在你同时使用eq和压缩的时候，一样可以用到。
很直接的问题：可以先eq再压缩，或是先压缩再eq吗？答案依赖与你为什么做eq。
如果你是因为某一轨音频的声源类型或是缺陷（可能是太闷，低音太多，中频不够出彩之类的任何原因），你应该先eq再压缩。
如果你压缩了一个eq有问题的音轨，压缩会让有问题的频段变得问题更大。这导致我们很难得到一个完美的压缩结果，我们都很容易想到这一点。
换个方向考虑，如果一个轨道本来就拥有很平衡的声音，我们就不需要在压缩前做eq了。但此时的压缩动作常常导致声音听起来变得不那么平衡，所以实际工作中也存在压缩后再做eq的可能性。
最终的解决办法是，把问题分开讨论，合理的利用eq。当这个观念深入到你脑子里，你会很清楚的想到，在压缩前要解决eq问题，在压缩后你也需要让频响变得完美。
这是个不同以往的eq插件应用实例，当然它也不影响你什么。。。。除了给你带来好处。。。。。
这种做法在母带处理中被经常用到，但是在你同时使用eq和压缩的时候，一样可以用到。
很直接的问题：可以先eq再压缩，或是先压缩再eq吗？答案依赖与你为什么做eq。
如果你是因为某一轨音频的声源类型或是缺陷（可能是太闷，低音太多，中频不够出彩之类的任何原因），你应该先eq再压缩。
如果你压缩了一个eq有问题的音轨，压缩会让有问题的频段变得问题更大。这导致我们很难得到一个完美的压缩结果，我们都很容易想到这一点。
换个方向考虑，如果一个轨道本来就拥有很平衡的声音，我们就不需要在压缩前做eq了。但此时的压缩动作常常导致声音听起来变得不那么平衡，所以实际工作中也存在压缩后再做eq的可能性。
最终的解决办法是，把问题分开讨论，合理的利用eq。当这个观念深入到你脑子里，你会很清楚的想到，在压缩前要解决eq问题，在压缩后你也需要让频响变得完美。
这是个不同以往的eq插件应用实例，当然它也不影响你什么。。。。除了给你带来好处。。。。。
www.MIXONLINE.COM
有空多去看看，那里有很多录音师 混音师的经验，我今天看到一个不错的文章了
叫《HUMAN ELEMETAL》
分别访问了三个录音师~~有一些知识的确让我不能不改变一些“漏习”。
http://mixonline.com/mag/audio_human_element/index.html
有空多去看看，那里有很多录音师 混音师的经验，我今天看到一个不错的文章了
叫《HUMAN ELEMETAL》
分别访问了三个录音师~~有一些知识的确让我不能不改变一些“漏习”。
http://mixonline.com/mag/audio_human_element/index.html