录音/制作/创作 吉他 扩声技术 视频技术 作品展示 生活 信息 更多... | 音频应用专卖店

Universal Audio UA Apollo Twin 视频及效果

( 6 )
 
[收藏]

100
#1 16-3-17 08:09

Universal Audio UA Apollo Twin 视频及效果



不知道这是不是算是能K歌了呢?他们怎么录的呢?

3891
#2 16-3-17 08:36
看过这哥们讲的用uad混音视频

100
#3 16-3-17 11:39
asiazhang 发表于 16-3-17 08:36
看过这哥们讲的用uad混音视频

效果确实不错,我挺喜欢的,这个效果不知道在YY里会不会一样

688
#4 16-3-17 13:55
感觉Sweetwater上一个哥们的评价比较中肯,贴上原文和翻译:

UAD Quality at a UAD Price
by Nick D. from SF, Bay Area
Music Background: Producer, Engineer, Artist
February 26, 2016

I pre-ordered my Apollo Twin four months ago and I finally received it. It was well worth the wait.I am a mobile producer with a large stationary studio, and I wanted to be able to fluidly produce on the go, mix and master in the studio, and transition seamlessly into outboard gear with one single, portable unit.I am impressed. The converters sound killer. I've run some electric guitar through the device using some of the onboard DSP and was highly impressed. I have been bussing out mixes to my RND MBP and back in while clipping the converters and have pleasantly distorted them while retaining all of the detail and clarity of much higher priced converters.The only reason for knocking off a star is because of the UAD plugin pricing model. Yes, the device is relatively cheap, but the plugins cost much more than they are worth, and to me, this money would be much better invested in the hardware counterparts that UAD is trying to emulate. $350 for a reverb? Nah, I think I'll save for the Bricasti. $399 for Pultec emulations? I'd rather spend money on the Warm Audio EQP and get the real thing. The GUIs are the selling point for most of these plugs. UAD, why don't you let Sweetwater sell your plugins? I believe the bundles and deals Sweetwater could put together would be much more appealing.Overall, the hardware is impeccable. Does everything I ask of it, but the plugins are a little overpriced.

四个月前预购入坑,东西已到手,感觉等待是值得的。我是家大工作室的游击队制作人,希望能在外面浪的时候也能动次大次,然后回工作室混缩。我希望能够把我的工作无脑过渡到一个单一的便携设备上去。这玩意儿听起来很牛逼。我用这东西撸了一把电吉他,爽到爆。搞了把混音到我的MBP,注意我的可是视网膜版本的MBP,然后再整回这玩意儿里面去剪辑,失真效果灰常爽,保留了全部的细节呈现了在更贵设备上才有的清晰度。扣掉一分的原因,不是怕UA骄傲,而是因为UAD插件的价格。没错,这玩意儿硬件相对还算便宜,但是它的插件的价格远超它们的价值,对我来说,把这些钱投入到UAD尽力去模仿的那些硬件设备本身上更有价值。$350刀去买一个混响插件?哈哈,我完全可以存下来去买Bricasti.$399刀去买一个Pultec插件?那还不如去买Warm Audio EQP这些真东西。其实大多数这些插件的卖点是在它们的用户界面上。UAD,你为啥不让sweetwater去卖你的插件?我相信sweetwater做的套餐和优惠一定会有吸引力的多。总的说来,硬件没啥问题,叫它舔,它就不敢入身,但它的插件价格有点黑。

100
#5 16-3-17 16:59
Seraph81 发表于 16-3-17 13:55
感觉Sweetwater上一个哥们的评价比较中肯,贴上原文和翻译:

UAD Quality at a UAD Price

哈哈哈,,翻译的牛。。。UAD确实有点贵,,所以导致大家共享,共享插件多,价格便宜。。

9214
#6 16-3-17 17:53
是滴,除以6来算,在打折的时候 平均算下来 每个收费性插件大概是140元左右,所以一个30来个共享包 (有10个赠送插件需要减去)有差不多3000元的价值。

218
#7 16-3-18 22:06
他们用的什么话筒呢?哪位知道啊?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

搜索